Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote Lifelong Healthy Eating (2024)

Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote LifelongHealthy Eating (1) Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote LifelongHealthy Eating (2)

Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail.

Summary

Healthy eating patterns in childhood and adolescence promoteoptimal childhood health, growth, and intellectual development;prevent immediate health problems, such as iron deficiency anemia,obesity, eating disorders, and dental caries; and may preventlong-term health problems, such as coronary heart disease, cancer,and stroke. School health programs can help children andadolescents attain full educational potential and good health byproviding them with the skills, social support, and environmentalreinforcement they need to adopt long-term, healthy eatingbehaviors.

This report summarizes strategies most likely to be effectivein promoting healthy eating among school-age youths and providesnutrition education guidelines for a comprehensive school healthprogram. These guidelines are based on a review of research,theory, and current practice, and they were developed by CDC incollaboration with experts from universities and from national,federal, and voluntary agencies.

The guidelines include recommendations on seven aspects of aschool-based program to promote healthy eating: school policy onnutrition, a sequential, coordinated curriculum, appropriateinstruction for students, integration of school food service andnutrition education, staff training, family and communityinvolvement, and program evaluation.

INTRODUCTION

School-based programs can play an important role in promotinglifelong healthy eating. Because dietary factors "contributesubstantially to the burden of preventable illness and prematuredeath in the United States," the national health promotion anddisease prevention objectives encourage schools to providenutrition education from preschool through 12th grade (1). The U.S.Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Nutrition Education and Training(NET) Program urges "nutrition education {to} be a majoreducational component of all child nutrition programs and offeredin all schools, child care facilities, and summer sites" by theyear 2000 (2). Because diet influences the potential for learningas well as health, an objective of the first national educationgoal is that children "receive the nutrition and health care neededto arrive at school with healthy minds and bodies" (3).

The recommendations in this report are intended to helppersonnel and policymakers at the school, district, state, andnational levels meet the national health objectives and educationgoals by implementing school-based nutrition education policies andprograms. This report may also be useful to students, to parents,and to personnel in local and state health departments,community-based health and nutrition programs, pediatric clinics,and training institutions for teachers and public healthprofessionals. These recommendations complement CDC guidelines forschool health programs to prevent the spread of acquiredimmunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (4), to prevent tobacco use andaddiction (5), and to promote physical activity (6).

In this report, nutrition education refers to a broad range ofactivities that promote healthy eating behaviors. The nutritioneducation guidelines focus largely on classroom instruction, butthey are relevant to all components of a comprehensive schoolhealth program -- health education; a healthy environment; healthservices; counseling, psychological, and social services;integrated school and community efforts; physical education;nutrition services; and school-based health promotion for facultyand staff (7). Although the meals served by school food serviceprograms are an important part of a school health program, thisreport does not provide specific recommendations related topurchasing and preparing food for school meals. Detailedinformation on this topic is available from many other publications(8-19) and information sources (see Appendix A). These guidelinesalso do not address the specific nutrition education and counselingneeds of pregnant adolescents (20,21) or young persons with specialneeds (22-28).

These guidelines are based on a synthesis of research, theory,and current practice and are consistent with the principles of thenational health education standards (29), the opportunity-to-learnstandards for health education (29), the position papers of leadingvoluntary organizations involved in child nutrition (30), and thenational action plan to improve the American diet (31). To developthese guidelines, CDC convened meetings of experts in nutritioneducation, reviewed published research, considered therecommendations of national policy documents (1,32-35), andconsulted with experts from national, federal, and voluntaryorganizations.

EFFECTS OF DIET ON THE HEALTH, GROWTH, AND INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENTOF YOUNG PERSONS

School-based nutrition education can improve dietary practicesthat affect young persons' health, growth, and intellectualdevelopment. Immediate effects of unhealthy eating patterns includeundernutrition, iron deficiency anemia, and overweight and obesity.

Undernutrition

Even moderate undernutrition can have lasting effects onchildren's cognitive development and school performance (36).Chronically undernourished children attain lower scores onstandardized achievement tests, especially tests of languageability (37). When children are hungry or undernourished, they havedifficulty resisting infection and therefore are more likely thanother children to become sick, to miss school, and to fall behindin class (36,37); they are irritable and have difficultyconcentrating, which can interfere with learning (38); and theyhave low energy, which can limit their physical activity (38). Somereports have estimated that millions of children in the UnitedStates experience hunger over the course of a year (39), but noscientific consensus currently exists on how to define or measurehunger (1).

Skipping breakfast can adversely affect children's performancein problem-solving tasks (40-42). A study of low-income elementaryschool students indicated that those who participated in the SchoolBreakfast Program had greater improvements in standardized testscores and reduced rates of absence and tardiness than did childrenwho qualified for the program but did not participate (43). Twelvepercent of students reported skipping breakfast the day before onenational survey was taken (44); 40% of 8th- and 10th-grade studentsin another study reported having eaten breakfast on less than orequal to 2 days the week before the survey (45). Strategies toencourage adequate nutrition among young persons include thefollowing:

  • Promote participation in USDA food assistance programs (e.g., the School Breakfast Program and School Lunch Program, the Summer Food Service Program, and the Child and Adult Care Food Program).

  • Advise parents and guardians about community-based food supplementation programs (e.g., food stamps; local food pantries; and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children {WIC}).

  • Educate students and their families about the importance of eating breakfast.

Iron Deficiency Anemia

Iron deficiency anemia is the most common cause of anemia inthe United States (33). Iron deficiency hampers the body's abilityto produce hemoglobin, which is needed to carry oxygen in theblood. This deficiency can increase fatigue, shorten attentionspan, decrease work capacity, reduce resistance to infection, andimpair intellectual performance (33,46). Among school-age youths,female adolescents are at greatest risk for iron deficiency.Approximately 1% of elementary school-age children and 2%-4% ofadolescent girls ages 12-19 years show evidence of iron deficiencyanemia (47). To prevent iron deficiency, children and adolescentsshould eat adequate amounts of foods high in iron and in vitamin C,which helps the body absorb iron efficiently (33).

Overweight and Obesity *

Overweight and obesity are increasing among children andadolescents in the United States (48-52). The prevalence ofoverweight among youths ages 6-17 years in the United States hasmore than doubled in the past 30 years; most of the increase hasoccurred since the late 1970s (52). Approximately 4.7 million, or11%, of youths ages 6-17 years are seriously overweight (52).Obesity in young persons is related to elevated blood cholesterollevels (53-56) and high blood pressure (57-59), and some very obeseyouths suffer from immediate health problems (e.g., respiratorydisorders, orthopedic conditions, and hyperinsulinemia) (60). Beingoverweight during childhood and adolescence has been associatedwith increased adult mortality (61,62). Furthermore, obese childrenand adolescents are often excluded from peer groups anddiscriminated against by adults, experience psychological stress,and have a poor body image and low self-esteem (63,64). Increasedphysical activity and appropriate caloric intake are recommendedfor preventing and reducing obesity (35). CDC's guidelines forschool and community health programs to promote physical activityamong youths address strategies for increasing physical activityamong young persons (6).

Unsafe Weight-Loss Methods

Many young persons in the United States practice unsafeweight-loss methods. Deliberately restricting food intake over longperiods can lead to poor growth and delayed sexual development(65). Data from one study indicated that the rate of smokinginitiation is higher for adolescent girls who diet or who areconcerned about their weight than for nondieters or girls havingfew weight concerns (66), and another study indicated that manywhite female high school students who smoke report using smoking tocontrol their appetite and weight (67). Harmful weight losspractices have been reported among girls as young as 9 years old(68,69). Young persons involved in certain competitive sports anddancing are particularly at risk for unsafe weight controlpractices (70). A national survey of 8th- and 10th-grade studentsfound that 32% skipped meals, 22% fasted, 7% used diet pills, 5%induced vomiting after meals, and 3% used laxatives to lose weight(45). Children and adolescents should learn about the dangers ofunsafe weight-loss methods and about safe ways to maintain ahealthy weight. The emphasis of society in the United States onthinness should be challenged, and young persons need to develop ahealthy body image (71).

Eating Disorders

Eating disorders (e.g., anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa)are psychological disorders characterized by severe disturbances ineating behavior. Anorexia nervosa is characterized by a refusal tomaintain a minimally normal body weight, and bulimia nervosa ischaracterized by repeated episodes of binge eating followed bycompensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting (72). Eatingdisorders often start in adolescence, and greater than 90% of casesoccur among females (72). Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosaaffect as many as 3% of adolescent and young adult females, and theincidence of anorexia nervosa appears to have increased in recentdecades (72). Compared with adolescents who have normal eatingpatterns, adolescents who have eating disorders tend to have lowerself-esteem; a negative body image; and feelings of inadequacy,anxiety, social dysfunction, depression, and moodiness (73). Eatingdisorders can cause many severe complications, and mortality ratesfor these disorders are among the highest for any psychiatricdisorder (74). Persons who have eating disorders should receiveimmediate medical and psychological treatment.

Dental Caries

Dental caries is perhaps the most prevalent of all diseases(1). It affects 50.1% of youths ages 5-17 years and 84.4% of youthsage 17 years (75). More than 50 million hours of school time arelost annually because of dental problems or dental visits (76).Dental caries is a progressive disease, which, if left untreated,can result in acute infections, pain, costly treatment, and toothloss. A strong link exists between sugar consumption and dentalcaries (33). To prevent dental caries, children and adolescentsshould drink fluoridated water, use fluoridated toothpaste, brushand floss their teeth regularly, have dental sealants applied tothe pits and fissures of their teeth, and consume sugars inmoderation (1).

EFFECTS OF CHILDHOOD EATING PATTERNS ON CHRONIC DISEASE RISKS OFADULTS

Nutrition education also should focus on preventing childrenand adolescents from developing chronic diseases during adulthood.Some of the physiological processes that lead to diet-relatedchronic disease begin in childhood. For example, autopsy studieshave demonstrated that early indicators of atherosclerosis (thehardening of the arteries that is the most common cause of coronaryheart disease {CHD}) begin in youth (77-83) and are related toblood cholesterol levels in young persons (79,81-83). Unhealthyeating practices that contribute to chronic disease are establishedearly in life; young persons having unhealthy eating habits tend tomaintain these habits as they age (84). Thus, it is efficacious toteach persons healthy eating patterns when they are young;high-risk eating behaviors and physiological risk factors aredifficult to change once they are established during youth.

Diet-related risk factors for cardiovascular disease (e.g.,high blood cholesterol level, high blood pressure, and overweight)are common in youths in the United States (34,52,85-90). Comparedwith their peers, children and adolescents who have high bloodcholesterol (34,91-96), have high blood pressure (97,98), or areobese (91,99-103) are more likely to have these risk factors duringadulthood. Poor diet and inadequate physical activity togetheraccount for at least 300,000 deaths in the United States annuallyand are second only to tobacco use as the most prominentidentifiable contributor to premature death (104). Interventionsthat promote healthy eating and physical activity behaviors duringchildhood and adolescence may not only prevent some of the leadingcauses of illness and death but also decrease direct health-carecosts and improve quality of life.

Diet is a known risk factor for the development of thenation's three leading causes of death: CHD, cancer, and stroke(33). Other health problems of adulthood associated with diet arediabetes, high blood pressure, overweight, and osteoporosis.

Coronary Heart Disease

CHD kills more persons in the United States than any otherdisease does (1). Diet-related risk factors for CHD include highblood cholesterol, high blood pressure, and obesity. These riskfactors can be reduced by consuming less fat (particularlysaturated fat) and cholesterol and by increasing physical activity(105).

Cancer

One out of every five deaths in the United States isattributable to cancer (106). Dietary factors have been associatedwith several types of cancer, including colon, breast, and prostate(33). All cancer deaths in the United States might be reduced asmuch as 35% through dietary changes (107,108). The risk for sometypes of cancer may be reduced by maintaining a healthy weight;limiting consumption of fat, alcohol, and salt-cured, salt-pickled,or smoked foods; and eating more foods that protect the bodyagainst cancer (fruits, vegetables, whole grain cereals, and otherhigh-fiber foods) (109). The National Cancer Institute adviseseating at least five servings of fruits and vegetables each day(110).

Stroke

Cerebrovascular disease, or stroke, is the third leading causeof death in the United States and a major cause of illness anddisability (111). The most important risk factor for stroke is highblood pressure, which often can be controlled or prevented byadopting a healthy diet and maintaining a healthy weight (112). Therisk for stroke can be reduced by consuming less sodium, increasingphysical activity, and maintaining a healthy body weight.

Diabetes

Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the UnitedStates (104). CHD is two to four times more common and stroke istwo to six times more common in persons who have diabetes than inpersons who do not have diabetes (113). Diabetes can lead toblindness, kidney disease, and nerve damage (113).Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, which affectsapproximately 90% of persons who have diabetes, is often associatedwith obesity (114). Maintaining a desirable body weight throughphysical activity and modest caloric restriction is important inpreventing diabetes and controlling its complications (114).

High Blood Pressure

High blood pressure is a major cause of CHD, stroke, andkidney failure. About one in four adults in the United States hashigh blood pressure (115). Persons who have high blood pressurehave three to four times the risk of developing CHD and as much asseven times the risk of stroke as do those who have normal bloodpressure (116). Persons can reduce their risk for high bloodpressure by consuming less sodium, increasing physical activity,and maintaining a healthy body weight. A diet high in potassium mayhelp reduce the risk of high blood pressure (117).

Overweight

In the United States, about one in three adults is overweight(118), and these persons are at increased risk for CHD, some typesof cancer, stroke, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, andgallbladder disease (33). Overall risk for premature death isincreased by excess weight; the risk increases as severity ofoverweight increases (33). The best way to lose weight is toincrease physical activity and control caloric intake, preferablyby adopting a diet that is low in fat and high in vegetables,fruits, and grains (35).

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a decrease in the amount of bone so severethat the bone fractures easily. About 1.3 million bone fractures,including many fatal hip fractures, occur per year in personsgreater than or equal to 45 years of age (33). Low dietary calcium,a mineral essential for bone growth, may be associated with anincreased risk for osteoporosis (33). For females especially,eating enough calcium is particularly important during childhood,adolescence, and young adulthood -- when bones approach their maximumdensity -- to reduce the risk for osteoporosis later in life (1,119-122). Regular weight-bearing exercises also can help preventosteoporosis (33).

GUIDELINES FOR HEALTHY EATING

To prevent certain diseases and to promote good health,persons greater than 2 years of age should follow the sevenrecommendations that constitute the Dietary Guidelines forAmericans (35). These guidelines are developed by the USDA andUSDHHS and are published every 5 years. They are based on extensivereviews of hundreds of studies conducted over many years andrepresent the best current advice that nutrition scientists cangive. The guidelines are consistent with dietary recommendationsmade by major health promotion organizations, including theNational Research Council (32), the National Cholesterol EducationProgram of the National Institutes of Health (34,105), the NationalCancer Institute (109), the American Cancer Society (123), and theAmerican Heart Association (124).

The principles contained in the Dietary Guidelines forAmericans should be the primary focus of school-based nutritioneducation. By enabling young persons to adopt practices consistentwith the guidelines, schools can help the nation meet its healthobjectives (1), which were designed to guide health promotion anddisease prevention policy and programs at the federal, state, andlocal level throughout the 1990s. Objective 2.19 is to "increase toat least 75 percent the proportion of the Nation's schools thatprovide nutrition education from preschool through 12th grade,preferably as part of quality school health education" (1). The sixrelevant dietary guidelines are (a) eat a variety of foods; (b)balance the food you eat with physical activity -- maintain orimprove your weight; (c) choose a diet with plenty of grainproducts, vegetables, and fruits; (d) choose a diet low in fat,saturated fat, and cholesterol; (e) choose a diet moderate insugars; and (f) choose a diet moderate in salt and sodium. (Theseventh recommendation concerns adults and alcoholic beverages.)Enabling children and adolescents to follow these guidelines canhelp the nation achieve these national health objectives for theyear 2000 (1):2.3 Reduce overweight to a prevalence of less than or equal to 20%

among people aged 20 and older and less than or equal to 15% amongadolescents aged 12 through 19.2.5 Reduce average dietary fat intake to less than or equal to 30%

of calories and average saturated fat intake to less than or equalto 10% of calories among people aged two and older.2.6 Increase complex carbohydrates and fiber-containing foods in

the diets of adults to five or more daily servings for vegetables(including legumes) and fruits and to six or more daily servingsfor grain products.2.7 Increase to greater than or equal to 50% the proportion of

overweight people aged 12 and older who have adopted sound dietarypractices combined with regular physical activity to attain anappropriate body weight.2.8 Increase calcium intake so greater than or equal to 50% of

youth aged 12 through 24 and greater than or equal to 50% ofpregnant and lactating women consume three or more servings dailyof foods rich in calcium, and greater than or equal to 50% ofpeople aged greater than or equal to 25 consume two or moreservings daily.2.9 Decrease salt and sodium intake so that greater than or equal

to 65% of home meal preparers prepare foods without adding salt,greater than or equal to 80% of people avoid using salt at thetable, and greater than or equal to 40% of adults regularlypurchase foods modified or lower in sodium.

The Food Guide Pyramid (Figure_1) was designed by the USDA andUSDHHS to help persons follow the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.Schools can use the pyramid to illustrate the concepts of variety(eat different foods from among and within the food groups),moderation (limit the consumption of foods high in fat and addedsugars), and proportionality (eat relatively greater amounts offoods from the groups that are lower in the pyramid: grains,vegetables, and fruits) (125). Other educational materialssupplement the pyramid by listing low-fat choices within each foodgroup (35).

EATING BEHAVIORS OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS IN THE UNITED STATES

Many young persons in the United States do not follow therecommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans or the FoodGuide Pyramid. On average, children and adolescents consume toomuch fat, saturated fat, and sodium and not enough fruits,vegetables, or calcium (44,126-129; CDC, unpublished data).Children and adolescents obtain 33%-35% of their calories from fatand 12%-13% from saturated fat (above the recommended levels of 30%and 10%, respectively) (44,128,129). Only 16% of children ages 6-11years and 15% of adolescents ages 12-19 years meet therecommendation for total fat intake; only 9% of children and 7% ofadolescents meet the recommendation for saturated fat intake (130).Almost one-half of 8th- and 10th-grade students eat three or moresnacks a day, and most of these snacks are high in fat, sugar, orsodium (45).

Unpublished data from CDC's 1993 Youth Risk Behavior Surveyindicated that, on the day before the survey, 41% of high schoolstudents in the United States ate no vegetables and 42% ate nofruits (127) (Appendix B). An analysis of a nationallyrepresentative sample of youths ages 2-18 years indicated that,over a 3-day period, the youths ate only 3.6 servings of fruits andvegetables daily and that fried potatoes accounted for a largeproportion of the vegetables consumed, 20.4% of the youths ate therecommended five or more servings of fruits and vegetables daily,50.8% ate fewer than one serving of fruit per day, and 29.3% atefewer than one serving per day of vegetables that were not fried(131). Adolescent females eat considerably less calcium and ironthan recommended by the Food and Nutrition Board of the NationalResearch Council (126,129).

Children and adolescents appear to be familiar with thegeneral relationship between nutrition and health but are lessaware of the relationship between specific foods and health. Forexample, young persons understand the importance of limiting fat,cholesterol, and sodium in one's diet, but they do not know whichfoods are high in fat, cholesterol, sodium, or fiber (45,132,133).One study indicated that adolescents were well-informed about goodnutrition and health but did not use their knowledge to makehealthy food choices (134).

THE NEED FOR SCHOOL-BASED NUTRITION EDUCATION

Young persons need nutrition education to help them developlifelong eating patterns consistent with the Dietary Guidelines forAmericans and the Food Guide Pyramid. Schools are ideal settingsfor nutrition education for several reasons:

  • Schools can reach almost all children and adolescents.

  • Schools provide opportunities to practice healthy eating. More than one-half of youths in the United States eat one of their three major meals in school, and 1 in 10 children and adolescents eats two of three main meals in school (135).

  • Schools can teach students how to resist social pressures. Eating is a socially learned behavior that is influenced by social pressures. School-based programs can directly address peer pressure that discourages healthy eating and harness the power of peer pressure to reinforce healthy eating habits.

  • Skilled personnel are available. After appropriate training, teachers can use their instructional skills and food service personnel can contribute their expertise to nutrition education programs.

  • Evaluations suggest that school-based nutrition education can improve the eating behaviors of young persons (136-138).

School-based nutrition education is particularly importantbecause today's children and adolescents frequently decide what toeat with little adult supervision (139). The increase in one-parentfamilies or families having two working parents and theavailability of convenience foods and fast-food restaurants inhibitparents' monitoring of their children's eating habits.

Young persons' food choices are influenced by televisionadvertisem*nts for low-nutritive foods. Young persons see about onefood advertisem*nt for every 5 minutes of Saturday morningchildren's shows (140). Most of the foods advertised duringchildren's programming are high in fat, sugar, or sodium;practically no advertisem*nts are for healthy foods such as fruitsand vegetables (140-142). Studies have indicated that, comparedwith those who watch little television, children and adolescentswho watch more television are more likely to have unhealthy eatinghabits and unhealthy conceptions about food (143), ask theirparents to buy foods advertised on television (144), and eat morefat (145). Some studies of young persons have found that televisionwatching is directly associated with obesity (146-149). Becauseyouths in the United States spend, on average, more than 20 hoursa week watching television (150) -- more time over the course of theyear than they are in school (141) -- school-based programs shouldhelp counter the effect of television on young persons' eatinghabits.

Schools are a critical part of the social environment thatshapes young persons' eating behaviors and can therefore play alarge role in helping improve their diet. However, schools cannotachieve this goal on their own when the cultural milieu has a largeinfluence on food-related beliefs, values, and practices (30,138).Families, food stores, restaurants, the food industry, religiousinstitutions, community centers, government programs, and the massmedia must also support the principles of the Dietary Guidelinesfor Americans. The USDA's Team Nutrition (see Appendix A) seeks togain the support of many sectors of society for improving the dietof young persons by creating innovative public and privatepartnerships that promote healthy food choices through the media,schools, families, and community (151).

PROMOTING HEALTHY EATING THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL HEALTHPROGRAM

In the school environment, classroom lessons alone might notbe enough to effect lasting changes in students' eating behaviors(30); students also need access to healthy food and the support ofpersons around them (137). The influence of school goes beyond theclassroom and includes normative messages from peers and adultsregarding foods and eating patterns. Students are more likely toreceive a strong, consistent message when healthy eating ispromoted through a comprehensive school health program.

A comprehensive school health program empowers students withnot only the knowledge, attitudes, and skills required to makepositive health decisions but also the environment, motivation,services, and support necessary to develop and maintain healthybehaviors (152). A comprehensive school health program includeshealth education; a healthy environment; health services;counseling, psychological, and social services; integrated schooland community efforts; physical education; nutrition services; anda school-based health program for faculty and staff (7). Eachcomponent can contribute to integrated efforts that promote healthyeating. For example, classroom lessons on nutrition can besupported by

  • schools providing appealing, low-fat, low-sodium foods in vending machines and at school meetings and events;

  • school counselors and nurses providing guidance on health and, if necessary, referrals for nutritional problems;

  • community organizations providing counseling or nutrition education campaigns;

  • physical education instructors helping students understand the relationship between nutrition and physical activity;

  • school food service personnel serving healthy, well-balanced meals in the cafeteria; and

  • school personnel acting as role models for healthy eating (153). The USDA is promoting health-enhancing changes in the food service component of the school health program by requiring schools to serve meals that comply with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (154) and by providing technical support to schools through Team Nutrition (151).

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH PROGRAMS PROMOTING HEALTHY EATING

Based on the available scientific literature, nationalnutrition policy documents, and current practice, these guidelinesprovide seven recommendations for ensuring a quality nutritionprogram within a comprehensive school health program. Theserecommendations address school policy on nutrition, a sequential,coordinated curriculum, appropriate and fun instruction forstudents, integration of school food service and nutritioneducation, staff training, family and community involvement, andprogram evaluation. Strategies that schools can use to achievethese recommendations are available (Appendix C). However, localschool systems need to assess the nutrition needs and issuesparticular to their communities, and they need to work with keyschool- and community-based constituents, including students, todevelop the most effective and relevant nutrition education plansfor their communities. Vigorous, coordinated, and sustained supportfrom communities, local and state education and health agencies,institutions of higher education, and national organizations alsois necessary to ensure success (29).

  1. Policy: Adopt a coordinated school nutrition policy that promotes healthy eating through classroom lessons and a supportive school environment.

  2. Curriculum for nutrition education: Implement nutrition education from preschool through secondary school as part of a sequential, comprehensive school health education curriculum designed to help students adopt healthy eating behaviors.

  3. Instruction for students: Provide nutrition education through developmentally appropriate, culturally relevant, fun, participatory activities that involve social learning strategies.

  4. Integration of school food service and nutrition education: Coordinate school food service with nutrition education and with other components of the comprehensive school health program to reinforce messages on healthy eating.

  5. Training for school staff: Provide staff involved in nutrition education with adequate preservice and ongoing in-service training that focuses on teaching strategies for behavioral change.

  6. Family and community involvement: Involve family members and the community in supporting and reinforcing nutrition education.

  7. Program evaluation: Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of the school health program in promoting healthy eating, and change the program as appropriate to increase its effectiveness.

Recommendation 1. Policy: Adopt a coordinated school nutritionpolicy that promotes healthy eating through classroom lessons anda supportive school environment.

Rationale for the Policy

A coordinated school nutrition policy, particularly as part ofan overall school health policy, provides the framework forimplementing the other six recommendations and ensures thatstudents receive nutrition education messages that are reinforcedthroughout the school environment. For example, such a policy wouldaddress nutrition education classes; school lunch and breakfast;classroom snacks and parties; use of food to reward or discipline;and food sold in vending machines, at school stores, snack bars,sporting events, and special activities, and as part of fundraisingactivities. The school environment can powerfully influencestudents' attitudes, preferences, and behaviors related to food(137). Without a coordinated nutrition policy, schools risknegating the health lessons delivered in the classroom andcafeteria by allowing actions that discourage healthy eatingbehaviors.

Developing the Policy

A school nutrition policy should be a brief document thatincorporates input from all relevant constituents of the schoolcommunity: students, teachers, coaches, staff, administrators, foodservice personnel, nurses, counselors, public health professionals,and parents. The policy should meet local needs and be adapted tothe health concerns, food preferences, and dietary practices ofdifferent ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Technical assistance forassessing nutrition education needs is available through the stateNET Program (155). Schools might consider using one or more of thefollowing techniques to assess their particular needs:

  • Interview nutrition professionals to learn more about local eating habits and to identify materials and services available for youths and adults. Schools might interview representatives from the school food service program; the state NET Program; the nutrition unit within the State Department of Health; the district or state school health coordinator; the local WIC program and Cooperative Extension nutrition education program; the state or local chapters of the American Cancer Society, American Dietetic Association, and the American Heart Association; nutrition councils or coalitions; university research programs; organizations with special insights into the particular nutrition education needs of cultural and ethnic minorities; or businesses that offer nutrition-related services or food products.

  • Interview food service staff about students' eating practices in the school cafeteria.

  • Observe the school cafeteria, the teachers' lunchroom, and other areas in the school where food is available.

  • Review nutrition curricula used by teachers.

  • Survey teachers to determine how nutrition is taught, whether teachers use food for reward or punishment, and the level of interest of teachers in nutrition or wellness programs for themselves.

  • Survey students to determine their dietary preferences and what types of healthy changes in school food they most want.

The policy plan should include means of obtaining follow-upinput from all parties and means of revising the plan as needed.Student involvement is critical to the success of a nutritionpolicy. A nutrition advisory committee or a nutrition subcommitteeof the school health advisory council having student members candevelop and promulgate a coordinated school nutrition policy.Technical assistance in forming a school nutrition advisorycommittee is available from the American School Food ServiceAssociation (Appendix A). Successful implementation of a nutritionpolicy also requires the active support of school and districteducational leadership.

Content of the Policy

The written policy should describe the importance of thenutrition component within the comprehensive school health program.This section can briefly describe the role of good nutrition inpromoting childhood growth, health, and learning; discuss the roleof child and adolescent nutrition in reducing the risk for chronicdiseases of adulthood; identify the importance of establishing aschool environment that supports healthy eating choices by youngpersons; and generate support for the policy by identifying howimprovements in student nutrition can satisfy the needs ofdifferent constituents of the school community (e.g., students,teachers, and food service personnel). An optimal policy onnutrition should publicly commit the school to providing adequatetime for a curriculum on nutrition, serving healthy and appealingfoods at school, developing food-use guidelines for teachers,supporting healthy school meals, and establishing links withnutrition service providers.

Curriculum. Adequate time should be allocated for nutritioneducation throughout the preschool, primary, and secondary schoolyears as part of a sequential, comprehensive school healtheducation program. In addition, teachers should be adequatelytrained to teach nutrition and be provided with ongoing in-servicetraining.

Healthy ** and appealing foods. Healthy and appealing foods shouldbe available in meals, a la carte items in the cafeteria, snackbars, and vending machines (Exhibit 1) (Table_1); as classroomsnacks; and at special events, athletic competitions, staffmeetings, and parents' association meetings. In addition, schoolsshould discourage the sale of foods high in fat, sodium, and addedsugars (e.g., candy, fried chips, and soda) on school grounds andas part of fundraising activities. Although selling low-nutritivefoods may provide revenue for school programs, such sales tellstudents that it is acceptable to compromise health for financialreasons (158). The school thereby risks contradicting the messageson healthy eating given in class. If schools contract with foodservice management companies to supply meals, the contractorsshould be required to serve appealing, low-fat, low-sodium mealsthat comply with the standards of the Dietary Guidelines forAmericans.

Food use guidelines for teachers. Schools should discourageteachers from using food for disciplining or rewarding students.Some teachers give students low-nutritive foods, such as candy, asa reward for good behavior, and punish misbehaving students bydenying a low-nutritive treat (159). These practices reinforcestudents' preferences for low-nutritive foods and contradict whatis taught during nutrition education. Schools should recommend thatboth teachers and parents serve healthy party snacks and treats(160).

Support for healthy school meals. Starting with the 1996-1997school year, schools will be required to serve meals that complywith the standards of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (154).To encourage students to participate in school meal programs and tomake healthy choices in cafeterias, schools can use marketing-styleincentives and promotions (13,14,135,161); use healthy school mealsas examples in class; educate parents about the value of healthyschool meals; involve students and parents in planning meals; andhave teachers, administrators, and parents eat in the cafeteria andspeak favorably about the healthy meals available there. Studentsshould also be given adequate time and space to eat meals in apleasant and safe environment (162).

Links with nutrition service providers. Schools should establishlinks with qualified public health and nutrition professionals whocan provide screening, referral, and counseling for nutritionalproblems (30,163); inform families about supplemental nutritionservices available in the community, such as WIC (164), foodstamps, local food pantries, the Summer Food Service Program, andthe Child and Adult Care Food Program; and implement nutritioneducation and health promotion activities for school faculty, otherstaff, school board members, and parents. These links can helpprevent and resolve nutritional problems that can impair astudent's capacity to learn, demonstrate the value placed on goodnutrition for the entire school community, and help adults serve asrole models for school-age youths.

Recommendation 2. Curriculum for nutrition education: Implementnutrition education from preschool through secondary school as partof a sequential, comprehensive school health education curriculumdesigned to help students adopt healthy eating behaviors.

Nutrition Education as Part of a Comprehensive School HealthEducation Program

Nutrition education should be part of a comprehensive healtheducation curriculum that focuses on understanding the relationshipbetween personal behavior and health. This curriculum should givestudents the knowledge and skills they need to be "healthliterate," as delineated by the national health education standards(29) (Exhibit 2) (Table_2). The comprehensive health educationapproach is important to nutrition education because

  • unhealthy eating behaviors may be interrelated with other health risk factors (e.g., cigarette smoking and sedentary lifestyle) (165),

  • nutrition education shares many of the key goals of other health education content areas (e.g., raising the value placed on health, taking responsibility for one's health, and increasing confidence in one's ability to make health-enhancing behavioral changes), and

  • state-of-the-art nutrition education uses many of the social learning behavioral change techniques used in other health education domains. Therefore, nutrition education activities can reinforce, and be reinforced by, activities that address other health education topics as well as health in general.

Linking nutrition and physical activity is particularlyimportant because of the rising proportion of overweight youths inthe United States. Nutrition education lessons should stress theimportance of combining regular physical activity with soundnutrition as part of an overall healthy lifestyle. Physicaleducation classes, in turn, should include guidance in foodselection (6).

Sequential Lessons and Adequate Time

Students who receive more lessons on nutrition have morepositive behavioral changes than students who have fewer lessons(166,167). To achieve stable, positive changes in students' eatingbehaviors, adequate time should be allocated for nutritioneducation lessons. The curriculum should be sequential frompreschool through secondary school; attention should be paid toscope and sequence. When designing the curriculum, schools shouldassess and address their students' needs and concerns. A curriculumtargeted to a limited number of behaviors might make the mosteffective use of a scarce instructional time available fornutrition education (136).

To maximize classroom time, nutrition education can beintegrated into the lesson plans of other school subjects; forexample, math lessons could analyze nutrient intake or readinglessons could feature texts on nutrition (168). Little research onthe integrated approach has been conducted (137), but embeddinginformation on nutrition in other courses probably reinforces thegoals of nutrition education. However, the exclusive use of anintegrative approach might sacrifice key elements of an effectivenutrition education program (e.g., adequate time, focusing onbehaviors and skill-building, attention to scope and sequence, andadequate teacher preparation) (137). Therefore, integration intoother courses can complement but should not replace sequentialnutrition education lessons within a comprehensive school healtheducation curriculum. Classroom time can be maximized also byhaving nutrition education lessons use skills learned in otherclasses (e.g., math or language arts) (169-171).

Organizations and agencies can supply information on specificnu*trition education curricula and materials (Appendix A). TheUSDA's NET Program provides technical assistance in school-basednutrition education (2,172). The Food and Nutrition InformationCenter of USDA's National Agricultural Library provides informationon nutrition education evaluation and resources and serves as anational depository and lending library for NET materials.Nutritionists at some organizations can also answer specificnu*trition content questions (Appendix A).

Focusing on Promoting Healthy Eating Behaviors

The primary goal of nutrition education should be to helpyoung persons adopt eating behaviors that will promote health andreduce risk for disease. Knowing how and why to eat healthily isimportant, but knowledge alone does not enable young persons toadopt healthy eating behaviors (137). Cognitive-focused curriculaon nutrition education typically result in gains in knowledge butusually have little effect on behavior (173-178).

Behaviorally based education encourages specific healthyeating behaviors (e.g., eating less fat and sodium and eating morefruits and vegetables) (136,179); however, it does not detail thetechnical and scientific knowledge on which dietary recommendationsare based and, therefore, might not fulfill science educationrequirements (180). The strategies listed in Appendix C can be usedas central concepts in a behaviorally based nutrition educationprogram.

Several programs using a behavioral approach have achievedsignificant (p less than 0.05), positive changes in students'eating behaviors (167,181-190). Compared with students in controlschools, students in some behaviorally based health and nutritioneducation programs had significant (p less than 0.05), favorablechanges in serum cholesterol levels (167,188,191), blood pressurelevel (167,191), and body mass index (184). Although most of thebehaviorally oriented programs did not achieve all their behavioralaims -- perhaps because of the limited amount of curriculum time(136) -- current scientific knowledge indicates that a focus onbehavior is a key determinant in the success of nutrition educationprograms (136-138).

Recommendation 3. Instruction for students: Provide nutritioneducation through developmentally appropriate, culturally relevant,fun, participatory activities that involve social learningstrategies.

Developmentally Appropriate and Culturally Relevant Activities

Different educational strategies should be used for youngpersons at different stages of cognitive development. Regardless ofthe amount and quality of teaching they receive, young elementaryschoolchildren might not fully understand abstract concepts (e.g.,the nutrient content of foods or the classification of foods intogroups) (192-194). Nutrition education for young children shouldfocus on concrete experiences (e.g., increasing exposure to manyhealthy foods and building skills in choosing healthy foods) (169).

More abstract associations between nutrition and health becomeappropriate as children approach middle school. By this age,children can understand and act on the connection between eatingbehaviors and health (137,194). Nutrition education for middle andhigh school students should focus on helping students assess theirown eating behaviors and set goals for improving their foodselection (138,195). Lessons for older children should emphasizepersonal responsibility, decision-making skills, and resistingnegative social pressures (183,185,187,189).

Nutrition education presents opportunities for young personsto learn about and experience cultural diversity related to foodand eating. Students from different cultural groups have differenthealth concerns, eating patterns, food preferences, andfood-related habits and attitudes. These differences need to beconsidered when designing lesson plans or discussing food choices.Nutrition education can succeed only when students believe it isrelevant to their lives.

Active Learning and an Emphasis on Fun

The context in which students learn about healthy eatingbehaviors and the feelings students associate with healthy foodsare key factors in determining their receptivity to nutritioneducation. Students are more likely to adopt healthy eatingbehaviors when

  • they learn about these behaviors through fun, participatory activities rather than through lectures (138,196,197);

  • lessons emphasize the positive, appealing aspects of healthy eating patterns rather than the negative consequences of unhealthy eating patterns;

  • the benefits of healthy eating behaviors are presented in the context of what is already important to the students; and

  • the students have repeated opportunities to taste foods that are low in fat, sodium, and added sugars and high in vitamins, minerals, and fiber during their lessons. ***

Computer-based lessons on nutrition can also be effective(198), especially when teacher time is limited or when studentself-assessment is appropriate. Interactive, highly entertaining,and well-designed computer programs are now available to help youngpersons learn healthy food selection skills and assess their owndiets (199,200). Computer-based lessons allow students to move attheir own pace and can capture their attention.

Social Learning Techniques

Most of the nutrition education programs that have resulted inbehavioral change have used teaching strategies based on sociallearning theory (195,201-205). In such lessons, increasing studentknowledge is only one of many objectives. Social learninginstruction also emphasizes

  • raising the value students place on good health and nutrition and identifying the benefits of adopting healthy eating patterns, including short-term benefits that are important to young persons (e.g., physical appearance, sense of personal control and independence, and capacity for physical activities);

  • giving students repeated opportunities to taste healthy foods, including foods they have not yet tasted;

  • working with parents, school personnel, public health professionals, and others to overcome barriers to healthy eating;

  • using influential role models, including peers, to demonstrate healthy eating practices;

  • providing incentives (e.g., verbal praise and small prizes) to reinforce messages;

  • helping students develop practical skills for and self-confidence in planning meals, preparing foods, reading food labels, and making healthy food choices through observation and hands-on practice;

  • enabling students to critically analyze sociocultural influences, including advertising, on food selection, to resist negative social pressures, and to develop social support for healthy eating; and

  • helping students analyze their own eating patterns, set realistic goals for changes in their eating behaviors, monitor their progress in reaching those goals, and reward themselves for achieving their goals. Nutrition education strategies include social learning techniques (Appendix C).

Recommendation 4. Integration of school food service and nutritioneducation: Coordinate school food service with nutrition educationand with other components of the comprehensive school healthprogram to reinforce messages on healthy eating.

The school cafeteria provides a place for students to practicehealthy eating. This experience should be coordinated withclassroom lessons to allow students to apply critical thinkingskills taught in the classroom (2,8,9,11-15,18,169,178,206). Schoolfood service personnel can

  • visit classrooms and explain how they make sure meals meet the standards of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans,

  • invite classes to visit the cafeteria kitchen and learn how to prepare healthy foods,

  • involve students in planning the school menu and preparing recipes,

  • offer foods that reinforce classroom lessons (e.g., whole wheat rolls to reinforce a lesson on dietary fiber),

  • post in the cafeteria posters and fliers on nutrition, and

  • display nutrition information about available foods and give students opportunities to practice food analysis and selection skills learned in the classroom.

In addition, classroom teaching can complement the goals ofthe school food service. For example, teachers can help foodservice managers by teaching students about the importance ofnutritious school meals and getting feedback from students on newmenu items developed to meet the goals set by USDA's School MealsInitiatives for Healthy Children (154).

To ensure consistent nutrition messages from the school, foodservice personnel should work closely with those responsible forother components of the school health program. For example, thepersonnel can

  • help develop and implement school policies that make healthful foods available;

  • educate parents about the value of school meals (e.g., put health messages in monthly menus sent home to parents or make periodic presentations at parents' association meetings) (11,13);

  • help schools access and assess community public health and nutrition services; and

  • keep classroom teachers, physical education teachers, coaches, counselors, health-service providers, and other staff informed about the importance of healthy school meals.

Recommendation 5. Training for school staff: Provide staff involvedin nutrition education with adequate preservice and ongoingin-service training that focuses on teaching strategies forbehavioral change.

Training in nutrition and health education can increase theextent to which teachers implement a curriculum (207-209), which inturn affects the likelihood that students' eating behaviors willchange (167,207). All elementary school teachers as well assecondary school teachers in disciplines such as home economics,family and consumer sciences, language arts, physical education,and science should receive nutrition education training. State NETPrograms can provide technical assistance for training teachers innutrition education (Appendix A).

Training should address content and teaching strategies.Because classroom teachers often need more help with innovativenutrition teaching techniques than with content (195,210), trainingshould focus on giving teachers the skills they need to use thenonlecture, active learning methods discussed previously (195).Training programs are most effective if they

  • are designed to meet the specific needs of the teachers and are based on the teachers' level of nutrition knowledge and experience with the suggested teaching strategies,

  • model behavioral change techniques and give teachers practice in using them,

  • involve multiple sessions spaced across time so that teachers can try out the newly learned techniques in their classrooms and report on their experiences to the training group, and

  • provide posttraining sessions so that teachers can share experiences with their peers (211,212).

Teachers should understand the importance of fullyimplementing the selected curriculum and become familiar with itsunderlying theory and concepts. Training should also help teachersassess and improve their own eating practices and make them awareof the behavioral messages they give as role models (213).

Continuing education activities in nutrition education shouldbe offered to food service personnel so this staff can reinforceclassroom instruction through the school meal program and helpshape the school's nutrition policy. State NET Programs and theNational Food Service Management Institute provide technicalassistance and training seminars for school nutrition professionals(see Appendix A). Administrative support is also critical toimplementing a new program (214). Training for schooladministrators can help gain their support for nutrition education.Health promotion services for all school staff can positivelyaffect their eating behaviors and their effectiveness in teachinghealthy eating behaviors (180,215,216).

Recommendation 6. Family and community involvement: Involve familymembers and the community in supporting and reinforcing nutritioneducation.

The attitudes and behaviors of parents and caretakers directlyinfluence children's and adolescents' choice of foods (217,218).Parents control most of the food choices available at home, sochanging parents' eating behaviors may be one of the most effectiveways to change their children's eating behaviors. Involving parentsin a nutrition education curriculum at the elementary school levelcan enhance the eating behaviors of both the students (181,219-221)and the parents (181,219,222). Although parental involvement canenhance the effects of nutrition education programs at theelementary school level, it is not known whether involving parentsat the secondary school level helps improve the students' eatingbehaviors. For older youths, self-assessment (185,189,198) and peereducators (187) might be more influential than parental involvement(137).

Parents are usually more receptive to activities that can bedone at home than to those that require their attendance at theschool (223,224). To involve parents and other family members innutrition education, schools can

  • send nutrition education materials and cafeteria menus home with students,

  • ask parents to send healthy snacks to school,

  • invite parents and other family members to periodically eat with their children in the cafeteria,

  • invite families to attend exhibitions of student nutrition projects or health fairs (217),

  • offer nutrition education workshops and screening services, and

  • assign nutrition education homework that students can do with their families (e.g., reading and interpreting food labels, reading nutrition-related newsletters, and preparing healthy recipes).

Through school health advisory councils or through direct contactwith community organizations, schools can engage communityresources and services to respond to the nutritional needs ofstudents (225,226). Schools can also participate in community-basednutrition education campaigns sponsored by public health agenciesor voluntary organizations. Students are most likely to adopthealthy eating behaviors if they receive consistent messagesthrough multiple channels (e.g., home, school, community, and themedia) and from multiple sources (e.g., parents, peers, teachers,health professionals, and the media) (225).

Recommendation 7. Program evaluation: Regularly evaluate theeffectiveness of the school health program in promoting healthyeating, and change the program as appropriate to increase itseffectiveness.

Policymakers should regularly review the effectiveness of theschool nutrition program. All groups affected by the program shouldhave the opportunity to provide input. Assessment of nutritionprograms and policies should include whether

  • a comprehensive school nutrition policy exists and is implemented as written;

  • nutrition education is provided throughout the preschool, primary, and secondary school years as part of comprehensive school health education;

  • teachers deliver nutrition education through developmentally appropriate, culturally relevant, fun, participatory activities that involve social learning strategies;

  • teachers and school food service personnel have undertaken joint project planning and action;

  • teachers have received curriculum-specific training; and

  • families and community organizations are involved in nutrition education.

Schools might also consider measuring the effects of theirprograms and policies on self-reported eating behaviors; keyvariables that influence behavior, such as knowledge, attitudes,self-confidence, and behavioral intentions; and in-school eatingbehaviors that are easy to assess, such as participation in schoolfood service programs and the number of students choosing healthyalternatives in the cafeteria (e.g., salad bars or low-fat milk).

Schools can consult with the state NET Program or withevaluation specialists at universities, school districts, or thestate departments of education or health to identify methods andmaterials for evaluating the effectiveness of their program(227,228). Valid evaluations can increase parent and communitysupport for school programs, help schools reward teachers forexceptional work, and support grant applications for enhancingschool health programs.

CONCLUSION

To ensure a healthy future for our children, school-basednutrition education programs must become a national priority. Theseprograms should be part of comprehensive school health programs andreach students from preschool through secondary school. Schoolleaders, community leaders, and parents must commit to implementingand sustaining nutrition education programs within the schools.Such support is crucial to promoting healthy eating behaviors.

The seven recommendations for school-based nutrition educationpresented in this report provide the framework for establishingsuch programs. By adopting these recommendations, schools can helpensure that all school-age youths attain their full educationalpotential and good health.

References

  1. Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Full report, with commentary. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1991. DHHS publication no. (PHS) 91-50212.

  2. Mandell RJ, ed. The strategic plan for nutrition education: promoting healthy eating habits for our children. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Nutrition and Technical Services Division, 1993.

  3. National Education Goals Panel. The national educational goals report: building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Education Goals Panel, 1992.

  4. CDC. Guidelines for effective school health education to prevent the spread of AIDS. MMWR 1988;37(S-2):1-14.

  5. CDC. Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. MMWR 1994;43(RR-2):1-18.

  6. CDC. Guidelines for school and community health programs to promote physical activity among youth. MMWR (in press).

  7. Allensworth DD, Kolbe LJ. The comprehensive school health program: exploring an expanded concept. J Sch Health 1987;57(10):409-12.

  8. American Cancer Society. Changing the course: a manual for school foodservice providers. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1990.

  9. American Heart Association. Lower fat and cholesterol easily and economically. . .with Hearty School Lunch. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1992.

  10. Ellison RC, Capper AL, Goldberg RJ, Witschi JC, Stare FJ. The environmental component: changing school food service to promote cardiovascular health. Health Educ Q 1989;16(2):285-97.

  11. Gregoire MB, Sneed J. Standards for nutrition integrity. Sch Food Serv Res Rev 1994;18(2):106-11.

  12. Nicklas TA, Forcier JE, Farris RP, Hunter SM, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Heart Smart School Lunch Program: a vehicle for cardiovascular health promotion. Am J Health Promotion 1989;4(2):91-100.

  13. Nicklas TA, Stone E, Montgomery D, et al. Meeting the dietary goals for school meals by the year 2000: The CATCH Eat Smart school nutrition program. J Health Educ 1994;25(5):299-307.

  14. Raizman DJ, Montgomery DH, Osganian SK, et al. CATCH: food service program process evaluation in a multicenter trial. Health Educ Q 1994;(suppl 2):S51-S71.

  15. School Food Service Foundation. The healthy E.D.G.E. in schools: eating, dietary guidelines and education. Sch Food Serv J 1991;45(3 suppl):1-21.

  16. Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, Baranowski T, Forthofer R, O'Hara NM. Promoting physical activity and a healthful diet among children: results of a school-based intervention study. Am J Public Health 1991;81(8):986-91.

  17. Snyder MP, Story M, Lytle Trenkner L. Reducing fat and sodium in school lunch programs: the LUNCHPOWER! Intervention Study. J Am Diet Assoc 1992;92:1087-91.

  18. US Department of Agriculture. Building for the future: nutrition guidance for the child nutrition programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1992.

  19. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Finch AJ, Psaty BM. An environmental intervention to reduce dietary fat in school lunches. Pediatrics 1993;91(6):1107-11.

  20. Worthington-Roberts B, Endres J. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition management of adolescent pregnancy. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89(1):104-9.

  21. National Agricultural Library. Nutri-Topics: nutrition during pregnancy {resource list}. Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, Food and Nutrition Information Center, 1994.

  22. Alabama State Department of Education. CARE: special nutrition for kids workbook. Montgomery, AL: Alabama State Department of Education, 1995.

  23. Blyler EM, Lucas BL. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition in comprehensive program planning for persons with developmental disabilities. J Am Diet Assoc 1992;92(5):613-5.

  24. Cross B. Nutrition management for children with special needs in child nutrition programs: workshop proceedings. University, MS: National Food Service Management Institute, 1993.

  25. Cross B. Annotated bibliography: nutrition management for children with special needs. 2nd ed. University, MS: National Food Service Management Institute, 1993.

  26. US Department of Agriculture, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Sparks Clinics. Meeting their needs: training manual for food service personnel caring for children with special needs. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Nutrition Sciences, and the Sparks Clinics, 1994.

  27. Rokusek C, Heinrichs E. Nutrition and feeding for persons with special needs: a practical guide and resource manual. 2nd ed. Pierre, SD: South Dakota Department of Education and Cultural Affairs, Office of Child and Adult Nutrition, 1992.

  28. Wellman N, Sinofsky J, Crawford L, et al. Feeding for the future: exceptional nutrition in the IEP. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Nutrition Education and Training Program, State of Florida, 1995.

  29. Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards. National health education standards: achieving health literacy. An investment in the future. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1995.

  30. Society for Nutrition Education. Joint position of Society for Nutrition Education (SNE), The American Dietetic Association (ADA), and American School Food Service Association (ASFSA): school-based nutrition programs and services. J Nutr Educ 1995;27(2):58-61.

  31. Trumpfheller W, Foerster SB, Palombo R, eds. The national action plan to improve the American diet: a public/private partnership. Washington, DC: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, 1993.

  32. National Research Council. Diet and health: implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

  33. Public Health Service. The Surgeon General's report on nutrition and health. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1988. DHHS publication no. (PHS) 88-50210.

  34. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Report of the expert panel on blood cholesterol levels in children and adolescents. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1991. NIH publication no. 91-2732.

  35. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.

  36. Center on Hunger, Poverty and Nutrition Policy. Statement on the link between nutrition and cognitive development in children. Medford, MA: Tufts University School of Nutrition, 1995.

  37. Hinton AW, Heimindinger J, Foerster SB. Position of the American Dietetic Association: domestic hunger and inadequate access to food. J Am Diet Assoc 1990;90(10):1437-41.

  38. Troccoli KB. Eat to learn, learn to eat: the link between nutrition and learning in children. Washington, DC: National Health/Education Consortium, 1993. (National Health/Education Consortium occasional paper no. 7.)

  39. Food Research and Action Center. Community Childhood Hunger Identification Project: a survey of childhood hunger in the United States. Washington, DC: Food Research and Action Center, 1991.

  40. Pollitt E, Leibel RL, Greenfield D. Brief fasting, stress, and cognition in children. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1526-33.

  41. Pollitt E, Lewis NL, Garza C, Shulman RJ. Fasting and cognitive function. J Psychiatr Res 1982-83;17(2):169-74.

  42. Pollitt E. Does breakfast make a difference in school? J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95(10):1134-9.

  43. Meyers AF, Sampson AE, Weitzman M, Rogers BL, Kayne H. School Breakfast Program and school performance. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:1234-9.

  44. Devaney BL, Gordon AR, Burghardt JA. Dietary intakes of students. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61(1 suppl):205S-212S.

  45. American School Health Association, Association for the Advancement of Health Education, and the Society for Public Health Education. The National Adolescent Student Health Survey: a report on the health of America's youth. Oakland, CA: Third Party Publishing, 1989.

  46. Pollitt E. Iron deficiency and cognitive function. Annu Rev Nutr 1993;13:521-37.

  47. Dallman PR, Looker AC, Carroll M, Johnson CL. Influence of age on laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in infants and children. In: Hallburg L, ed. Proceedings of the symposium on iron nutrition in health and disease. London: John Libbey & Co. (in press).

  48. CDC. Prevalence of overweight among adolescents -- United States, 1988-91. MMWR 1994;43(44):818-21.

  49. Nicklas TA, Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Secular trends in dietary intakes and cardiovascular risk factors of 10-y-old children: the Bogalusa Heart Study (1973-1988). Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:930-7.

  50. Ross JG, Pate RR, Lohman TG, Christenson GM. Changes in the body composition of children. J Physical Educ Recreation Dance 1987;58(9):74-7.

  51. Shear CL, Freedman DS, Burke GL, Harsha DW, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Secular trends of obesity in early life: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Public Health 1988;78(1):75-7.

  52. Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents: the National Health Examination Surveys, 1963-1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1085-91.

  53. Freedman DS, Burke GL, Harsha DW, et al. Relationship of changes in obesity to serum lipid and lipoprotein changes in childhood and adolescence. JAMA 1985;254(4):515-20.

  54. Kikuchi DA, Srinivasan SR, Harsha DW, Webber LS, Sellers TA, Berenson GS. Relation of serum lipoprotein lipids and apolipoproteins to obesity in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev Med 1992;21:177-90.

  55. Laskarzewski P, Morrison JA, Mellies MJ, et al. Relationships of measurements of body mass to plasma lipoproteins in schoolchildren and adults. Am J Epidemiol 1980;111(4):395-406.

  56. Resnicow K, Morabia A. The relation between body mass index and plasma total cholesterol in a multiracial sample of US schoolchildren. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132(6):1083-90.

  57. Aristimuåo GG, Foster TA, Voors AW, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Influence of persistent obesity in children on cardiovascular risk factors: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation 1984;69(5):895-904.

  58. Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Lauer RM. Changes in ponderosity and blood pressure in childhood: the Muscatine Study. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124(2):195-206.

  59. Shear CL, Freedman DS, Burke GL, Harsha DW, Berenson GS. Body fat patterning and blood pressure in children and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Hypertension 1987;9:236-44.

  60. Dietz WH Jr. Obesity in infants, children, and adolescents in the United States. I. Identification, natural history, and aftereffects. Nutr Res 1981;1:117-37.

  61. Must A, Jacques PF, Dallal GE, Bajema CJ, Dietz WH. Long-term morbidity and mortality of overweight adolescents. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1350-5.

  62. Nieto FJ, Szklo M, Comstock GW. Childhood weight and growth rate as predictors of adult mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(2):201-13.

  63. Brownell KD. The psychology and physiology of obesity: implications for screening and treatment. J Am Diet Assoc 1984;84(4):406-14.

  64. Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ. Social and psychological consequences of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1985;103(6 pt 2):1062-7.

  65. Lifsh*tz F, Moses N. Nutritional dwarfing: growth, dieting, and fear of obesity. J Am Coll Nutr 1988;7(5):367-76.

  66. French SA, Perry CL, Leon GR, Fulkerson JA. Weight concerns, dieting behavior, and smoking initiation among adolescents: a prospective study. Am J Public Health 1994;84(11):1818-20.

  67. Camp DE, Klesges RC, Relyea G. The relationship between body weight concerns and adolescent smoking. Health Psychol 1993;12(1):24-32.

  68. Maloney MJ, McGuire J, Daniels SR, Specker B. Dieting behavior and eating attitudes in children. Pediatrics 1989;84(3):482-9.

  69. Mellin LM. Responding to disordered eating in children and adolescents. Nutr News 1988;51(2):5-7.

  70. Beals KA, Manore MM. The prevalence and consequences of subclinical eating disorders in female athletes. Int J Sport Nutr 1994;4:175-95.

  71. Collins ME. Promoting healthy body image through the comprehensive school health program. J Health Educ 1991;22(5):297- 302.

  72. American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

  73. Trowbridge F, Collins B. Measuring dietary behaviors among adolescents. Public Health Rep 1993;108(suppl 1):37-41.

  74. Herzog DB, Copeland PM. Eating disorders. N Engl J Med 1985;313(5):295-303.

  75. National Institute of Dental Research. Oral health of United States children: the national survey of dental caries in U.S. school children: 1986-87. National and regional findings. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1989. NIH publication no. 89-2247.

  76. Gift HC, Reisine ST, Larach DC. The social impact of dental problems and visits. Am J Public Health 1992;82(12):1663-8.

  77. Enos WF Jr, Beyer JC, Holmes RH. Pathogenesis of coronary disease in American soldiers killed in Korea. JAMA 1955;158(11):912-4.

  78. McNamara JJ, Molot MA, Stremple JF, Cutting RT. Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA 1971;216(7):1185-7.

  79. Newman WP III, Freedman DS, Voors AW, et al. Relation of serum lipoprotein levels and systolic blood pressure to early atherosclerosis: the Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1986;314:138-44.

  80. Strong JP. Coronary atherosclerosis in soldiers: a clue to the natural history of atherosclerosis in the young. JAMA 1986;256(20):2863-6.

  81. Freedman DS, Newman WP III, Tracy RE, et al. Black-white differences in aortic fatty streaks in adolescence and early adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation 1988;77(4):856-64.

  82. Newman WP III, Wattigney W, Berenson GS. Autopsy studies in United States children and adolescents: relationship of risk factors to atherosclerotic lesions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;623:16-25.

  83. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth Research Group. Relationship of atherosclerosis in young men to serum lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and smoking: a preliminary report from the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. JAMA 1990;264(23):3018-24.

  84. Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp K-I, Lytle LL. Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors. Am J Public Health 1994;84(7):1121-6.

  85. Berenson GS, Epstein FA. Conference on blood lipids in children: optimal levels for early prevention of coronary artery disease. Workshop report: Epidemiological Section. Prev Med 1983;12:741-97.

  86. Frerichs RR, Srinivasan SR, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels in 3,446 children from a biracial community: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation 1976;54(2):302-9.

  87. Kwiterovich PO Jr. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels in childhood. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;623:90-107.

  88. Lauer RM, Connor WE, Leaverton PE, Reiter MA, Clarke WR. Coronary heart disease risk factors in school children: the Muscatine Study. J Pediatr 1975;86(5):697-706.

  89. Webber LS, Osganian V, Luepker RV, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors among third grade children in four regions of the United States: the CATCH study. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141(5):428-39.

  90. Wynder EL. An American Health Foundation monograph: coronary artery disease prevention: cholesterol, a pediatric perspective. Prev Med 1989;18:323-409.

  91. Ernst ND, Obarzanek E. Child health and nutrition: obesity and high blood cholesterol. Prev Med 1994;23:427-36.

  92. Lauer RM, Lee J, Clarke WR. Factors affecting the relationship between childhood and adult cholesterol levels: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 1988;82(3):309-18.

  93. Orchard TJ, Donahue RP, Kuller LH, Hodge PN, Drash AL. Cholesterol screening in childhood: does it predict adult hypercholesterolemia? The Beaver County experience. J Pediatr 1983;103(5):687-91.

  94. Porkka KVK, Viikari JSA, Akerblom HK. Tracking of serum HDL-cholesterol and other lipids in children and adolescents: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Prev Med 1991;20:713-24.

  95. Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS. Tracking of serum lipids and lipoproteins from childhood to adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133(9):884-99.

  96. Wynder EL. Summary and recommendations of the conference on blood lipids in children: optimal levels for early prevention of coronary artery disease. Prev Med 1983;12:728-40.

  97. Lauer RM, Clarke WR. Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 1989;84(4):633-41.

  98. Shear CL, Burke GL, Freedman DS, Berenson GS. Value of childhood blood pressure measurements and family history in predicting future blood pressure status: results from 8 years of follow-up in the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics 1986;77(6):862-9.

  99. Casey VA, Dwyer JT, Coleman KA, Valadian I. Body mass index from childhood to middle age: a 50-y follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:14-8.

  100. Coates TJ, Thoresen CE. Treating obesity in children and adolescents: a review. Am J Public Health 1978;68(2):143-51.

  101. Freedman DS, Shear CL, Burke GL, et al. Persistence of juvenile-onset obesity over eight years: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Public Health 1987;77(5):588-92.

  102. Garn SM, LaVelle M. Two-decade follow-up of fatness in early childhood. Am J Dis Child 1985;139:181-5.

  103. Guo SS, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Gardner JD, Siervogel RM. The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35 y. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:810-9.

  104. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270(18):2207-12.

  105. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Report of the expert panel on population strategies for blood cholesterol reduction. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1990. NIH publication no. 90-3046.

  106. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures -- 1995. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1995.

  107. Doll R. The lessons of life: keynote address to the Nutrition and Cancer Conference. Cancer Res 1992;52(suppl):2024S-2029S.

  108. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.

  109. Butrum RR, Clifford CK, Lanza E. NCI dietary guidelines: rationale. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:888-95.

  110. National Cancer Insitute. Eat more fruits & vegetables -- 5 a day for better health. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1991. NIH publication no. 92-3248.

  111. American Heart Association. Heart and stroke facts: 1995 statistical supplement. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1994.

  112. American Heart Association. Heart and stroke facts. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1994.

  113. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Diabetes statistics. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1994. Publication no. 94-3822.

  114. American Diabetes Association. Medical management of non-insulin-dependent (Type II) diabetes. 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association, 1994.

  115. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Working group report on primary prevention of hypertension. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1993. NIH publication no. 93-2669.

  116. Dawber TR. The Framingham Study: the epidemiology of atherosclerotic disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

  117. Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med 1993;153:154-83.

  118. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults. JAMA 1994;272(3):205-11.

  119. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Optimal Calcium Intake. Optimal calcium intake. JAMA 1994;272(24):1942-8.

  120. Matkovic V. Calcium and peak bone mass. J Intern Med 1992;231:151-60.

  121. Sandler RB, Slemenda CW, LaPorte RE, et al. Postmenopausal bone density and milk consumption in childhood and adolescence. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:270-4.

  122. Sentipal JM, Wardlaw GM, Mahan J, Matkovic V. Influence of calcium intake and growth indexes on vertebral bone mineral density in young females. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:425-8.

  123. Weinhouse S, Bal DG, Adamson R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines on diet, nutrition, and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1991;41(6):334-8.

  124. Chait A, Brunzell JD, Denke MA, et al. Rationale of the diet-heart statement of the American Heart Association: report of the Nutrition Committee. Circulation 1993;88(6):3008-29.

  125. Human Nutrition Information Service. The food guide pyramid. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service, 1992. (Home and Garden bulletin no. 252.)

  126. Alaimo K, McDowell MA, Briefel RR, et al. Dietary intake of vitamins, minerals, and fiber of persons ages 2 months and over in the United States: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988-91. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, 1994. (Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 258.) DHHS publication no. (PHS) 95-1250.

  127. Kann L, Warren CW, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance -- United States, 1993. MMWR 1995;44(SS-1):1-56.

  128. McDowell MA, Briefel RR, Alaimo K, et al. Energy and macronutrient intakes of persons ages 2 months and over in the United States: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988-91. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, 1994. (Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 255.) DHHS publication no. (PHS) 95-1250.

  129. Tippett KS, Mickle SJ, Goldman JD, et al. Food and nutrient intakes by individuals in the United States, 1 day, 1989-91. Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, 1995. Nationwide Food Surveys report no. 91-2.

  130. Lewis CJ, Crane NT, Moore BJ, Hubbard VS. Healthy People 2000: report on the 1994 nutrition progress review. Nutr Today 1994;29(6):6-14.

  131. Krebs-Smith SM, Cook DA, Subar AF, Cleveland L, Friday J, Kahle LL. Fruit and vegetable intakes of children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:81-6.

  132. Murphy AS, Youatt JP, ho*rr SL, Sawyer CA, Andrews SL. Nutrition education needs and learning preferences of Michigan students in grades 5, 8, and 11. J Sch Health 1994;64(7):273-8.

  133. Resnicow K, Reinhardt J. What do children know about fat, fiber, and cholesterol? A survey of 5,116 primary and secondary school students. J Nutr Educ 1991;23(2):65-71.

  134. Story M, Resnick MD. Adolescents' views on food and nutrition. J Nutr Educ 1986;18(4):188-92.

  135. Dwyer J. The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61(1 suppl):173S-177S.

  136. Contento IR, Manning AD, Shannon B. Research perspective on school-based nutrition education. J Nutr Educ 1992;24:247-60.

  137. Contento I, Balch GI, Bronner YL, et al. Nutrition education for school-aged children. J Nutr Educ 1995;27(6):298-311.

  138. Lytle L, Achterberg C. Changing the diet of America's children: what works and why? J Nutr Educ 1995;27(5):250-60.

  139. Crockett SJ, Sims LS. Environmental influences on children's eating. J Nutr Educ 1995;27(5):235-49.

  140. Kotz K, Story M. Food advertisem*nts during children's Saturday morning television programming: are they consistent with dietary recommendations? J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:1296-1300.

  141. Cotugna N. TV ads on Saturday morning children's programming -- what's new? J Nutr Educ 1988;20(3):125-7.

  142. Taras HL, Gage M. Advertised foods on children's television. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:649-52.

  143. Signorielli N, Lears M. Television and children's conceptions of nutrition: unhealthy messages. Health Commun 1992;4(4):245-57.

  144. Taras HL, Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Nader PR, Nelson JA. Television's influence on children's diet and physical activity. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1989;10(4):176-80.

  145. Robinson TN, Killen JD. Ethnic and gender differences in the relationships between television viewing and obesity, physical activity, and dietary fat intake. J Health Educ 1995;26(2 suppl):S91-S98.

  146. Pate RR, Ross JG. Factors associated with health-related fitness. J Physical Educ Recreation Dance 1987;58(9):93-5.

  147. Dietz WH Jr, Gortmaker SL. Do we fatten our children at the television set? Obesity and television viewing in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1985;75(5):807-12.

  148. Obarzanek E, Schreiber GB, Crawford PB, et al. Energy intake and physical activity in relation to indexes of body fat: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;60:15-22.

  149. Shannon B, Peaco*ck J, Brown MJ. Body fatness, television viewing and calorie-intake of a sample of Pennsylvania sixth grade children. J Nutr Educ 1991;23(6):262-8.

  150. Nielsen Media Research. Nielsen report on television. New York: Nielsen Media Research, 1990.

  151. Team Nutrition. A healthier tomorrow. Alexandria, VA: Team Nutrition, 1995.

  152. Resnicow K. Cancer prevention and comprehensive school health education: the role of the American Cancer Society. Paper presented at the American Cancer Society National Conference, Atlanta, GA, May 28-30, 1991.

  153. Allensworth D, Wyche J, Lawson E, Nicholson L, eds. Defining a comprehensive school health program: an interim statement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.

  154. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Service. 7 CFR Parts 210 and 220. National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: school meal initiatives for healthy children. Federal Register 1995;60(113):31188-222.

  155. US Department of Agriculture. Needs assessment guide for the Nutrition Education and Training Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1994.

  156. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR Part 101. Food labeling: nutrient content claims, definition of term: healthy. Federal Register 1994;59(89):24232-50.

  157. US Department of Health and Human Services. The new food label. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 1995. Publication no. BG 95-14.

  158. Caldwell DR, Pilant VB. Position of the American Dietetic Association: competitive foods in schools. J Am Diet Assoc 1991;91(9):1123-5.

  159. Wolfe WS, Campbell CC. Nutritional health of school-aged children in upstate New York: what are the problems and what can schools do? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 1991.

  160. West Virginia Department of Education. Let's party: party ideas for school and home. 2nd ed. Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Education, 1993.

  161. Snyder P, Lytle L, Pellegrino T, Anderson M, Selk J. Commentary on school meals from school food service personnel and researchers. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61(suppl):247S-249S.

  162. American School Food Service Association. Creating policy for nutrition integrity in schools. Alexandria, VA: American School Food Service Association, 1994.

  163. McConnell PE, Shaw JB. Position of the American Dietetic Association: child nutrition services. J Am Diet Assoc 1993;93(3):334-6.

  164. Steinschneider J, Coyne AH. Bringing WIC to school. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 1995.

  165. Lytle LA, Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp K-I. Covariance of adolescent health behaviors: the Class of 1989 Study. Health Educ Res 1995;10(2):133-46.

  166. Devine CM, Olson CM, Frongillo EA Jr. Impact of the Nutrition for Life program on junior high students in New York State. J Sch Health 1992;62(8):381-5.

  167. Resnicow K, Cohn L, Reinhardt J, et al. A three-year evaluation of the Know Your Body Program in inner-city schoolchildren. Health Educ Q 1992;19(4):463-80.

  168. Weiss EH, Kien CL. A synthesis of research on nutrition education at the elementary school level. J Sch Health 1987;57(1):8-13.

  169. Contento IR, Kell DG, Keiley MK, Corcoran RD. A formative evaluation of the American Cancer Society Changing the Course nutrition education curriculum. J Sch Health 1992;62(9):411-6.

  170. Bagby R, Campbell VS, Achterberg C. Every day, lots of ways: an interdisciplinary nutrition curriculum for kindergarten-sixth grade. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania State Department of Education, 1993.

  171. Zeller PK, Jacobson MF. Eat, think, and be healthy! Creative nutrition activities for children. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 1987.

  172. Kalina BB, Philipps CA, Minns HV. The NET Program: a ten-year perspective. J Nutr Educ 1989;21(1):38-42.

  173. Byrd-Bredbenner C, O'Connell LH, Shannon B. Junior high home economics curriculum: its effect on students' knowledge, attitude, and behavior. Home Econ Res J 1982;11(2):123-33.

  174. Byrd-Bredbenner C, O'Connell LH, Shannon B, Eddy JM. A nutrition curriculum for health education: its effect on students' knowledge, attitude, and behavior. J Sch Health 1984;54(10):385-8.

  175. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Shannon B, Hsu L, Smith DH. A nutrition education curriculum for senior high home economics students: its effect on students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. J Nutr Educ 1988;20(6):341-6.

  176. German MJ, Pearce J, Wyse BW, Hansen RG. A nutrition component for high school health education curriculums. J Sch Health 1981;51(3):149-53.

  177. Lewis M, Brun J, Talmage H, Rasher S. Teenagers and food choices: the impact of nutrition education. J Nutr Educ 1988;20(6):336-40.

  178. Shannon B, Chen AN. A three-year school-based nutrition education study. J Nutr Educ 1988;20(3):114-24.

  179. Havas S, Heimendinger J, Damron D, et al. 5 a day for better health -- nine community research projects to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Rep 1995;110(1):68-79.

  180. DeFriese GH, Crossland CL, MacPhail-Wilcox B, Sowers JG. Implementing comprehensive school health programs: prospects for change in American schools. J Sch Health 1990;60(4):182-7.

  181. Coates TJ, Jeffery RW, Slinkard LA. Heart healthy eating and exercise: introducing and maintaining changes in health behaviors. Am J Public Health 1981;71(1):15-23.

  182. Coates TJ, Barofsky I, Saylor KE, et al. Modifying the snack food consumption patterns of inner-city high school students: the Great Sensations Study. Prev Med 1985;14:234-47.

  183. Howison D, Niedermyer F, Shortridge R. Field testing a fifth-grade nutrition education program designed to change food-selection behavior. J Nutr Educ 1988;20(2):82-6.

  184. Killen JD, Telch MJ, Robinson TN, Maccoby N, Taylor CB, Farquhar JW. Cardiovascular disease risk reduction for tenth graders: a multiple-factor school-based approach. JAMA 1988;260(12):1728-33.

  185. King AC, Saylor KE, Foster S, et al. Promoting dietary change in adolescents: a school-based approach for modifying and maintaining healthful behavior. Am J Prev Med 1988;4(2):68-74.

  186. Perry CL, Mullis RM, Maile MC. Modifying the eating behavior of young children. J Sch Health 1985;55(10):399-402.

  187. Perry CL, Klepp K-I, Halper A, et al. Promoting healthy eating and physical activity patterns among adolescents: a pilot study of "Slice of Life." Health Educ Res 1987;2(2):93-103.

  188. Walter HJ. Primary prevention of chronic disease among children: the school-based "Know Your Body" intervention trials. Health Educ Q 1989;16(2):201-14.

  189. White AA, Skinner JD. Can goal setting as a component of nutrition education effect behavior change among adolescents? J Nutr Educ 1988;20(6):327-35.

  190. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity: the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). JAMA 1996;275:768-76.

  191. Bush PJ, Zuckerman AE, Taggart VS, Theiss PK, Peleg EO, Smith SA. Cardiovascular risk factor prevention in black school children: the "Know Your Body" Evaluation Project. Health Educ Q 1989;16(2):215-27.

  192. Contento I. Children's thinking about food and eating -- a Piagetian-based study. J Nutr Educ 1981;13(1 suppl):S86-S90.

  193. Lieberman LD, Clark NM, Krone KV, Orlandi MA, Wynder EL. The relationship between cognitive maturity and information about health problems among school age children. Health Educ Res 1992;7(3):391-401.

  194. Lytle Trenkner L, Kelder SH. Nutrition education and school food service intervention as components of comprehensive school health education. Report to the American Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Technology Transfer of Behavioral Research, November 11, 1991.

  195. Killen JD, Robinson TN. School-based research on health behavior change: the Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program as a model for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. In: Rothkopf EZ, ed. Review of research in education. Vol. 15. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1988:171-200.

  196. Jaycox S, Baranowski T, Nader PR, Dworkin R, Vanderpool NA. Theory-based health education activities for third to sixth grade children. J Sch Health 1983;53(10):584-8.

  197. Rickard KA, Gallahue DL, Gruen GE, Tridle M, Bewley N, Steele K. The play approach to learning in the context of family and schools: an alternative paradigm for nutrition and fitness education in the 21st century. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:1121-6.

  198. Burnett KF, Magel PE, Harrington S, Taylor CB. Computer-assisted behavioral health counseling for high school students. J Counseling Psychol 1989;36(1):63-7.

  199. National Agricultural Library. Database of food and nutrition software and multimedia programs. Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, Food and Nutrition Information Center, 1995.

  200. Kolasa KM, Miller MG. New developments in nutrition education using computer technology. J Nutr Educ 1996;28:7-14.

  201. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

  202. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

  203. Baranowski T. Reciprocal determinism at the stages of behavior change: an integration of community, personal and behavioral perspectives. Int Q Community Health Educ 1989-90;10(4):297-327.

  204. Perry CL, Baranowski T, Parcel GS. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: social learning theory. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990:161-86.

  205. Perry CL, Jessor R. The concept of health promotion and the prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Health Educ Q 1985;12(2):169- 84.

  206. Smith SF, James MA. School lunch as a nutrition education resource for fourth graders. J Nutr Educ 1980;12(2):46-9.

  207. Connell DB, Turner RR, Mason EF. Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs. J Sch Health 1985;55(8):316-21.

  208. Olson CM, Devine CM, Frongillo EA Jr. Dissemination and use of a school-based nutrition education program for secondary school students. J Sch Health 1993;63(8):343-8.

  209. Ross JG, Luepker RV, Nelson GD, Saavedra P, Hubbard BM. Teenage Health Teaching Modules: impact of teacher training on implementation and student outcomes. J Sch Health 1991;61(1):31-4.

  210. Rye JA, Hunt BN, Nicely R Jr, Shannon B. The development of a nutrition inservice course for teachers of young children. J Nutr Educ 1982;14(3):93-6.

  211. Gingiss PL. Enhancing program implementation and maintenance through a multiphase approach to peer-based staff development. J Sch Health 1992;62(5):161-6.

  212. Contento I, Balch GI, Bronner YL, et al. Inservice preparation in nutrition education for professionals and paraprofessionals. J Nutr Educ 1995;27(6):347-54.

  213. Downey AM, Virgilio SJ, Serpas DC, Nicklas TA, Arbeit ML, Berenson GS. "Heart Smart" -- a staff development model for a school-based cardiovascular health intervention. Health Educ 1988;19(5):64-71.

  214. Smith DW, McCormick LK, Steckler AB, McLeroy KR. Teachers' use of health curricula: implementation of Growing Healthy, Project SMART, and the Teenage Health Teaching Modules. J Sch Health 1993;63(8):349-54.

  215. Baranowski T, Hearn MD, Baranowski JC, et al. Teach Well: the relation of teacher wellness to elementary student health and behavior outcomes: baseline subgroup comparisons. J Health Educ 1995:26(suppl 2):S61-S71.

  216. Johnson CC, Powers CR, Bao W, Harsha DW, Berenson GS. Cardiovascular risk factors of elementary school teachers in a low socio-economic area of a metropolitan city: the Heart Smart Program. Health Educ Res 1994;9(2):183-91.

  217. Johnson CC, Osganian SK, Budman SB, et al. CATCH: family process evaluation in a multicenter trial. Health Educ Q 1994;(suppl 2):S91-S106.

  218. Crockett SJ, Mullis RM, Perry CL. Parent nutrition education: a conceptual model. J Sch Health 1988;58(2):53-7.

  219. Hearn MD, Bigelow C, Nader PR, et al. Involving families in cardiovascular health promotion: the CATCH Feasibility Study. J Health Educ 1992;23(1):22-31.

  220. Kirks BA, Hendricks DG, Wyse BW. Parent involvement in nutrition education for primary grade students. J Nutr Educ 1982;14(4):137-40.

  221. Perry CL, Luepker RV, Murray DM, et al. Parent involvement with children's health promotion: the Minnesota Home Team. Am J Public Health 1988;78(9):1156-60.

  222. Crockett SJ, Mullis R, Perry CL, Luepker RV. Parent education in youth-directed nutrition interventions. Prev Med 1989;18:475-91.

  223. Crockett SJ, Perry CL, Pirie P. Nutrition intervention strategies preferred by parents: results of a marketing survey. J Nutr Educ 1989;21(2):90-4.

  224. Perry CL, Crockett SJ, Pirie P. Influencing parental health behavior: implications of community assessments. Health Educ 1987;18(5):68-77.

  225. Killip DC, Lovick SR, Goldman L, Allensworth DD. Integrated school and community programs. J Sch Health 1987;57(10):437-44.

  226. Kirby D. Comprehensive school health and the larger community: issues and a possible scenario. J Sch Health 1990;60(4):170-7.

  227. US Department of Agriculture. Evaluation guide for the Nutrition Education and Training Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 1995.

  228. Stone EJ, McGraw SA, Osganian SK, Elder JP, eds. Process evaluation in the multicenter Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Health Educ Q 1994;(suppl 2):S1- S142.

  229. CDC. School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS): a summary report. J Sch Health 1995;65(8):281-353.

* Obesity refers to an excess of total body fat. Body fat content is usually estimated by one of two techniques, measuring skinfold thickness or computing the ratio of body weight to height. Researchers who use weight-to-height ratios tend to use the term "overweight" instead of "obesity." Although weight-to-height ratios correlate highly with body fat, they do not distinguish between body fat and lean body tissue: excess fat tissue is generally assumed to account for the additional weight, but excess weight can also include lean body mass or a large body frame (33).

** As defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (156,157) in its food label regulations, a "healthy" food must be low in fat (less than or equal to 3 g per serving), be low in saturated fat (less than or equal to 1 g per serving), contain limited amounts of cholesterol (less than or equal to 60 mg per serving for a single-item food), and contain limited amounts of salt (less than or equal to 480 mg per serving until 1998, when the criterion for a single-item food will decrease to less than or equal to 360 mg per serving). In addition, single-item foods that are not raw fruits or vegetables must provide greater than or equal to 10% of the daily value of one or more of the following nutrients: vitamin A, vitamin C, iron, calcium, protein, and fiber. Criteria for products that include more than one type of food (e.g., macaroni and cheese) vary depending on the food.

*** When serving food, teachers must use hygienic food handling practices and consider possible food allergies and religious prohibitions; the food service director can help in this area.

Figure_1

Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote LifelongHealthy Eating (3)
Return to top.

Table_1

Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size.
EXHIBIT 1: Sample List of Vending Machine Foods Low in Saturated Fat (34)==================================================================================Canned fruitFresh fruit (e.g., apples and oranges) *Fresh vegetables (e.g., carrots)Fruit juice and vegetable juiceLow-fat crackers and cookies, such as fig bars and gingersnapsPretzelsBread products (e.g., bread sticks, rolls, bagels, and pita bread)Ready-to-eat, low-sugar cerealsGranola bars made with unsaturated fatLow-fat (1%) or skim milk *Low-fat or nonfat yogurt *Snack mixes of cereal and dried fruit with a small amount of nuts and seeds **Raisins and other dried fruit **Peanut butter and low-fat crackers ***----------------------------------------------------------------------------------* These foods are appropriate if the vending machine is refrigerated.** Some schools might not want to offer these items because these foods can contribute to dental caries.*** Some schools might not want to offer peanut butter; although it is low in saturated fatty acids, peanut butter is high in total fat.==================================================================================

Return to top.

Table_2

Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size.
EXHIBIT 2: National Health Education Standards (29)======================================================================1. Students will comprehend concepts related to health promotion and disease prevention.2. Students will be able to access valid health information and health-promoting products and services.3. Students will be able to practice health-enhancing behaviors and reduce health risks.4. Students will analyze the influence of culture, media, technology, and other factors on health.5. Students will be able to use interpersonal communication skills to enhance health.6. Students will be able to use goal-setting and decision-making skills to enhance health.7. Students will be able to advocate for personal, family, and community health.======================================================================

Return to top.

Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Page converted: 09/19/98

Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote LifelongHealthy Eating (4)
Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote Lifelong
Healthy Eating (2024)

FAQs

Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote Lifelong Healthy Eating? ›

The guidelines include recommendations on seven aspects of a school-based program to promote healthy eating: school policy on nutrition, a sequential, co- ordinated curriculum, appropriate instruction for students, integration of school food service and nutrition education, staff training, family and community in- ...

What are the 8 guidelines you should follow when eating healthy food? ›

8 tips for healthy eating
  1. Base your meals on higher fibre starchy carbohydrates. ...
  2. Eat lots of fruit and veg. ...
  3. Eat more fish, including a portion of oily fish. ...
  4. Cut down on saturated fat and sugar. ...
  5. Eat less salt: no more than 6g a day for adults. ...
  6. Get active and be a healthy weight. ...
  7. Do not get thirsty. ...
  8. Do not skip breakfast.

How can we promote healthy eating habits at school? ›

Schools and teachers can model healthy eating and being active at school by:
  1. Packing a healthy lunch and taking the time to eat it.
  2. Providing healthy snacks at school and staff functions (staff meetings, parent-teacher interviews, etc.)
  3. Using non-food rewards (pencils, skipping ropes) instead of lollies and sweets.

Which guidelines are recommended for all people to promote healthy eating? ›

Maintain healthy weight. Choose a diet low in fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol. Choose a diet with plenty of vegetables, fruits, and grain products. Use sugars only in moderation.

How many guidelines are there for healthful eating? ›

There are 4 overarching Guidelines in the 2020-2025 edition: Follow a healthy dietary pattern at every life stage. Customize and enjoy nutrient-dense food and beverage choices to reflect personal preferences, cultural traditions, and budgetary considerations.

What are 5 healthy eating guidelines? ›

Healthy Eating Guidelines
  • Eat more vegetables, salad and fruit - Up to seven servings a day.
  • Limit intake of high fat, sugar, salt (HFSS) food and drinks.
  • Size matters: Use the food pyramid as a guide for serving sizes.
  • Increase your physical activity levels.
  • Small changes can make a big difference. Start TODAY!

What are the 10 healthy lifestyle guidelines? ›

  • Measure and Watch Your Weight. ...
  • Limit Unhealthy Foods and Eat Healthy Meals. ...
  • Take Multivitamin Supplements. ...
  • Drink Water and Stay Hydrated, and Limit Sugared Beverages. ...
  • Exercise Regularly and Be Physically Active. ...
  • Reduce Sitting and Screen Time. ...
  • Get Enough Good Sleep. ...
  • Go Easy on Alcohol and Stay Sober.

What is the role of the school in promoting healthy habits? ›

Schools play an important role in promoting the health and safety of children and adolescents by helping them to establish lifelong health patterns. Healthy students are better learners, and academic achievement bears a lifetime of benefits for health.

Why should schools provide healthy lunches? ›

School lunch is critical to student health and well-being, especially for low-income students—and ensures that students have nutrition they need throughout the day to learn. Research shows that receiving free or reduced-price school lunches reduces food insecurity, obesity rates, and poor health.

Why is a balanced diet important for school students? ›

Food plays a vital role in preparing children and students to learn and making sure they are healthy enough to attend school each day. Nutrition impacts brain development, memory and cognitive function, energy, attention and focus, which are all critical to the ability to absorb and retain information.

What do the guidelines for healthy eating mean? ›

Choose fish, poultry, beans, and nuts; limit red meat and cheese; avoid bacon, cold cuts, and other processed meats. Eat a variety of whole grains (like whole-wheat bread, whole-grain pasta, and brown rice). Limit refined grains (like white rice and white bread).

What are the three key principles of healthy eating? ›

When deciding what to eat or drink, follow these three key dietary principles.
  • Meet nutritional needs primarily from nutrient-dense foods and beverages.
  • Choose a variety of options from each food group: vegetables, fruits, grains, dairy, and protein foods.
  • Pay attention to portion size.

Why is it important to follow the healthy eating guidelines? ›

People with healthy eating patterns live longer and are at lower risk for serious health problems such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity.

What are the guidelines for healthy eating habits and lifestyle? ›

Eat plenty of vegetables and fruit: They are important sources of vitamins, minerals, dietary fibre, plant protein and antioxidants. People with diets rich in vegetables and fruit have a significantly lower risk of obesity, heart disease, stroke, diabetes and certain types of cancer.

What is food guidelines? ›

Food-based dietary guidelines (also known as dietary guidelines) are intended to establish a basis for public food and nutrition, health and agricultural policies and nutrition education programmes to foster healthy eating habits and lifestyles.

What are 8 ways to stay healthy? ›

Once you've got those down, move on to the others.
  • Maintain A Healthy Weight. ...
  • Exercise Regularly. ...
  • Don't Smoke Or Use Smokeless Tobacco. ...
  • Eat a Healthy Diet. ...
  • Limit Alcohol – Zero Is Best. ...
  • Protect Yourself from the Sun And Avoid Tanning Beds. ...
  • Protect Yourself From Sexually Transmitted Infections. ...
  • Get Screening Tests.

What is 16 8 diet guidelines? ›

It involves consuming foods during an 8-hour window and avoiding food, or fasting, for the remaining 16 hours each day. Some people believe that this method works by supporting the body's circadian rhythm, which is its internal clock.

What is the 8 20 rule for eating? ›

The 80/20 rule is a guide for your everyday diet—eat nutritious foods 80 percent of the time and have a serving of your favorite treat with the other 20 percent. For the “80 percent” part of the plan, focus on drinking lots of water and eating nutritious foods that include: Whole grains.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 6279

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.